From the Winston-Salem Journal
The 2009 General Assembly convenes today in Raleigh amid what may be North Carolina’s biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression. If ever North Carolinians needed wisdom and good judgment from their legislators, this is the time.
Various estimates put the current year budget shortfall in the range of $1.2 billion to $3 billion. But this budget is no longer the responsibility of legislators. It is up to Gov. Bev Perdue, the manager of the budget, to make sure that spending and income balance by June 30, the end of the budget year.
The challenge for legislators is to craft a 2009-11 budget, which will take effect July 1, that is balanced despite the economic downturn. North Carolinians must demand that the top priorities of public education, essential medical care for our most vulnerable citizens and public safety are protected.
But the budget is not the only challenge facing legislators. The year opens with a wide-ranging legislative agenda.
The health-insurance plan for state employees and teachers is in serious trouble, possibly hundreds of millions of dollars in the red. Legislators can patch that hole with reserve funds, but they must redesign the system to fix the underlying problems at hand or else the problem will recur.
Similarly, the state’s mental-health system is so severely deficient that the federal government has refused to pay for some patients at state hospitals. While the fix is primarily a job for Perdue’s administration, legislators must assure that necessary changes to law are made.
The same holds true for the state’s troubled probation and parole system. It needs revamping in aspects ranging from technology upgrades to management practices. The legislature cannot allow such poor management of this system because public safety is very much at risk.
Many North Carolinians complain that the state’s city-annexation laws need changes. They are right to a degree. The state’s municipalities have offered a reasonable and practical series of reforms that will deal with some citizen concerns without abandoning the state’s very successful approach to urban sprawl.
Although a reform plan for insuring beach property may not sound of importance this far inland, it is. North Carolina’s beach-insurance plan is, in the words of the state insurance commissioner, “a ticking time bomb.” If it explodes, insurance companies and customers will be harmed statewide. Legislators must deal with this highly politicized issue so that the next coastal hurricane doesn’t send everyone’s insurance premiums skyward.
Finally, Perdue has fulfilled a promise at the N.C. Department of Transportation. She has told her board members that they can’t decide which projects get built. But now the legislature needs to encode that policy in state law. Otherwise, the next governor can go back to the bad old practices.
Each of these issues poses major challenges to our state legislators. If there is ever a year the people need them to meet those challenges, this is it.

February 4th, 2009 at 8:01 pm
Six out of the eleven are just tweaks to certain areas of the law that will not significantly change the problems that we have with the laws. Laws that have caused ongoing discontent for the last forty-eight years, which came to a head and brought us to where we are today.
The commission recommendations give us:
* A very minor change to how the annexation victims are notified of their impending fate. (NCLM #2)
* A minor adjustment to how we pay for those services that we never wanted or needed. (NCLM #12)
* A minor adjustment to the density standard used to qualify the next victims of municipal takeover.
* Minor adjustments to make it harder for cities to use “shoestring” or strips of land to take in areas. (NCLM #15 & 16)
* A minor adjustment to recourse with the LGC if services are not fully provided.
* An additional protection for large working farms from city regulation if the farm is annexed. (Shouldn’t it be absurd that large working farms can be annexed in the first place?)
* A lower threshold of necessary agreement in a low income area to petition for annexation. (NCLM # 19 & 20)
So what do we have left that could actually make meaningful reform happen?
The one recommendation to address meaningful services failed to pass but it was taken from the NCLM 20 point recommendations and fell far short of addressing the need to define what truly meaningful services are in the spirit of the NC Supreme Court ruling in Marvin v. Nolan. So the request to have meaningful services addressed by the Commission failed.
Oversight by the municipal officials on the Local Government Commission is a joke. Unless the legislators have the courage to reign in the cities abuse of FORCED annexation, which WOULD NOT put an end to the 80%+ of the voluntary annexations that the cities have used to grow, the upheaval and grumbling is not going to go away.