Congress Advances $106 Billion War-Funding Bill | Politics.MyNC.com

Categorized | National, Politics

Tags : , ,

Congress Advances $106 Billion War-Funding Bill

Posted on 17 June 2009 | Jennifer Wig

Congress Advances $106 Billion War-Funding Bill From AP

WASHINGTON  – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Wednesday that this is the last time Congress will go through the ordeal of passing an expensive, unpaid-for war spending bill. It may also be one of the more difficult.

The House, with almost no Republican support, on Tuesday barely approved a $106 billion emergency spending measure that includes $80 billion to sustain military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan through this budget year ending Sept. 30.

Republicans supported the war funds but objected to other parts of the bill, particularly $5 billion to open up a U.S. line of credit for an International Monetary Fund loan program for poorer countries hit by the world recession.

The war spending bill sailed through the Senate on a 86-3 vote last month, but passage of the House-Senate compromise worked out last week will be more of a challenge.

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. is expected to raise a point of order against a provision inserted in the compromise providing $1 billion for a “cash for clunkers” program that gives consumers government rebates when they trade in old vehicles for more fuel efficient models.

And Rep. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is upset that the final version removed a ban, backed by Graham and Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., on releasing photos depicting U.S. troops abusing detainees. President Barack Obama sent Congress a letter pledging that he would stop any attempt to release the photos, but Graham’s office said he wants more assurances and a vote on the issue before it goes to court next month.

It takes 60 votes in the Senate both to waive a point of order and to proceed to legislation over the objections of a senator.

Reid, citing the lack of Republican support in the House, said “it’ll be interesting to see what happens here. Are my Republican colleagues going to join with us to fund the troops? I hope so.”

He also said this would be “the last time we’ll have to do this because President Obama is honest with his budgeting.”

Every year since the Sept. 11 attacks Congress has passed emergency spending bills to finance the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and enhance security programs. Because these bills are off-budget – not included in annual budget considerations – they are not paid for and add to the national debt. If the current bill is enacted, the total spending for these “supplementals” since 2001 will approach $1 trillion, with about 70 percent going to Iraq.

Obama, who is seeking to wind down military operations in Iraq while bolstering military forces in Afghanistan, has pledged to fund all war operations through the regular defense budget. He has asked for $130 billion in the new fiscal year starting Oct. 1.

The spending bill also includes $10.4 billion for economic and other assistance to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Middle East and other countries, and $7.7 billion for pandemic flu preparations. It has $534 million for some 185,000 service members who have had their enlistments involuntarily extended since Sept. 11, 2001. They will receive $500 for every month they were held under stop-loss orders.

The House on Tuesday brought to the floor the first of 12 appropriations, or spending, bills that it must pass to run the federal government during the 2010 fiscal year. It immediately ran into trouble.

Appropriations bill are traditionally debated under a process that gives the minority free rein to offer amendments. But after Republicans proposed more than 100 amendments and would not agree to time limits on debate on a $64.4 billion measure funding law enforcement, science and census programs, Democrats temporarily pulled the bill so they could tighten the amendment procedure.

“If this continues, we will not finish appropriations bills before August” and there will be no time for other priorities such as health care and energy reform, said Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wis.

But Rep. Jerry Lewis of California, top Republican on the committee, said it appeared that the intent of Democrats “is to change the rules of the game in the middle of the first inning and shut the minority out of the legislative process altogether.”

Lewis will be allowed to offer an amendment that would prohibit funding for any attempt by the Obama administration to shut down the detainee facility at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. That amendment
would strengthen a provision already in the bill rejecting the administration’s request for $60 million for the Justice Department to carry out the closing of the facility.

The war spending bill also states that no money can be used for closing the detention facility this fiscal year. It also prohibits current detainees from being transferred to the United States except to be prosecuted and only after Congress receives a plan detailing risks involved.

The war funding bill is H.R. 2346. The appropriations bill is H.R. 2847.

Leave a Reply

Video Content

Candidate Statements

Decision 2008 in your inbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner