House Considers ‘Hookah Bar” Exemption To No Smoking Law | Politics.MyNC.com

Categorized | North Carolina, Politics

Tags : ,

House Considers ‘Hookah Bar” Exemption To No Smoking Law

Posted on 29 July 2009 | Jennifer Wig

House Considers ‘Hookah Bar” Exemption To No Smoking Law From Media General News Service

RALEIGH, N.C. — Apparently, state legislators don’t spend much time in hookah bars.

At least not the members of a House judiciary committee, which spent more than an hour yesterday debating the practice known as hookah smoking – a method of inhaling flavored tobacco through a long pipe, known as a hookah, which cools the smoke by drawing it through a bowl of water.

One legislator wanted to know if all of the “paraphernalia” used for hookah smoking is legal.

Another legislator joked that she had heard of topless bars before, but not hookah bars.

Despite their alien status around the General Assembly, about 20 hookah bars or lounges exist in North Carolina, mainly around college campuses. And they’re at risk of going out of business under the state’s recently passed law banning smoking in bars and restaurants.

The smoking ban will take effect in January. Before that happens, some legislators want to amend the ban by creating an exemption in the law that would allow existing hookah bars to continue to allow smoking.
State Rep. Cullie Tarleton, D-Watauga, is trying to get the exemption passed in the House. Tarleton was a strong supporter of the original smoking ban, but he said yesterday that the ban’s impact on hookah bars was unintended.

The trouble for Tarleton and supporters of hookah is that getting the exemption passed will require the legislature to revisit one of the most contentious bills of the year. And there’s not much time – depending on what happens with state budget negotiations, the 2009 legislative session could be in its final days.

“I am not interested in opening Pandora’s box here,” Tarleton said yesterday. “All I want to do is to save some 20 small businesses across the state that opened legally, legitimately, with the full intention of serving a population. (The smoking ban) is going to shut them down, and that’s an unintended consequence.”
The smoking ban – signed into law by Gov. Bev Perdue on May 19 – already contains an exemption for cigar bars, which get most of their revenue from the sale of cigars. But it has no such exemption for hookah.
Tarleton’s bill would allow existing hookah bars to continue to allow hookah smoking, but it would not allow any new hookah bars to open.

The House judiciary committee added a further restriction yesterday – it amended the bill to require that hookah bars that sell alcohol could not admit anyone under age 21. Hookah supporters said that amendment isn’t fair, because many other establishments are allowed to serve alcohol while still allowing patrons who are under 21.

About half of the state’s hookah establishments currently have permits to sell alcohol.

After adding the age-restriction requirement, the judiciary committee narrowly approved Tarleton’s bill. It now goes to the floor of the House.

Anti-smoking advocates and some social conservatives oppose the exemption for hookah bars. They said that hookah smoking is just as unhealthy as cigarette smoking, and they said that hookah bars entice young people to smoke.

But hookah supporters said that people use hookahs very differently from the way they use cigarettes. Hookah smoking is usually a social experience where a group of people shares a small amount of flavored tobacco while listening to music or eating food.

“They don’t go in to get a nicotine fix,” said Connor McGrath of Boone. McGrath and Jesse Kellogg are two students at Appalachian State University who recently opened a hookah lounge. They were in Raleigh yesterday urging legislators to allow their new business, and similar businesses around the state, to stay afloat.

Tarleton has taken up their cause, calling it an issue of fairness that could save 100 jobs at the state’s 20 hookah bars.

But other legislators were much more skeptical.

“I’m getting ready to vote on something I know absolutely nothing about,” said Rep. Johnathan Rhyne,

R-Lincoln, during yesterday’s committee meeting.

“I didn’t either until two weeks ago,” Tarleton replied.

3 Comments For This Post

  1. Matthew says:

    About time. It has been patently ridiculous that the law exempted one kind of smoking-bar business (Cigar Bars) while banning another outright (Hookah Bars).

    Both business models are practically identical, creating a space where tobacco products can be enjoyed over a beer. The only difference is the kind of tobacco used. Given that, its hardly fair law to ban one and allow the other. It would be like a law banning Vodka but allowing Rum. Silly.

  2. Michael says:

    I dont see the problem with hookah smoking. People go to these lounges knowing what kind of experience they will have! Not like going to a place to eat and having someone smoking a cigarette beside you. You go to a hookah lounge WANTING to smoke, the decision is made by the consumer! I have been a fan of hookah smoking since i was 18, and i as a customer, I made my decision, to attend these bars.

    I agree with matthew it is not fair to exempt one tobacco business and not the other. I myself am looking to open my own lounge here in North Carolina, and if hookah lounges are not exempted that will pay a toll on my future plans.

  3. Hannah says:

    You should have seen the look on their faces when i started smoking in the local again…

Leave a Reply

Video Content

Candidate Statements

Decision 2008 in your inbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner