Bailout | Politics.MyNC.com

Tag Archive | "bailout"

NC House Approves Bailout Of State Health Plan

Tags: , , ,


RALEIGH, N.C.  – The state House on Tuesday approved a taxpayer bailout of more than $730 million for the health insurance plan for state employees and retirees.

The 64-52 vote came after House members decided hiring an outside accounting firm to review the plan’s books could salve some of the anger of state workers over higher copays and deductibles that they say amount to a pay cut. A separate blue-ribbon committee would review how the plan providing health care coverage for about 667,000 state workers, teachers, retirees and dependents has been managed in recent years.

“We don’t really know yet what caused the health plan to suffer the unprecedented losses,” said Rep. John Blust, R-Guilford, who wanted responsibility for overseeing the health plan taken away from the Legislature and given to governors.

The Senate three weeks ago passed a $678 million bailout expected to keep health care bills paid through mid-2011. A final version is likely to come out of a House-Senate negotiating committee.

Legislators failed to meet a self-imposed April 1 deadline for getting the legislation to Gov. Beverly Perdue despite the warnings by the health plan administrator that the plan will run out of money to pay doctors and hospitals. Those worries eased after Perdue took control of a $250 million reserve fund under her authority to ensure the state’s budget balances when the books close June 30.

The House version would require the state to spend $730 million from the state operating revenues and highway funds over the next two years to keep the plan afloat. Annual deductibles in the most popular “standard” benefit plan would increase from $600 a year to $800 for in-network coverage.

Official Warns Congress Not To Force Lending

Tags: , , ,


WASHINGTON  – The official in charge of the Treasury’s $700 billion bailout program for the financial sector warned Congress that the government should not force banks to make loans that bankers may deem risky.

Neel Kashkari, interim assistant secretary for financial stability at Treasury, told a congressional oversight panel Wednesday that bad lending practices were at the root of the financial crisis and cautioned Congress not to “micromanage” institutions that receive government funds.

“However well-intended, government officials are not positioned to make better commercial decisions than lenders in our communities,” he said.

Kashkari, who was put in the job under the Bush administration, testified amid growing impatience among members of Congress who want to see evidence that the taxpayer money is actually loosening credit markets.

Lawmakers on a subcommittee of the House Oversight and Reform Committee voiced frustration with what they said was a continued lack of clarity from the Treasury on how banks were spending money they have received under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Under the program, the federal government has used more than $300 billion in taxpayer money to infuse financial institutions with cash, much of it by purchasing preferred stock and other assets.

Subcommittee chairman Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, complained that at least three financial institutions that have received TARP money – Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp., and J.P. Morgan Chase and Co. – have made foreign investments.

“If the banking system is in serious enough trouble to require massive amounts of federal support, shouldn’t that federal support be channeled to the domestic economy?” Kucinich asked.

The misgivings were bipartisan.

“We don’t know if $300 billion has changed anyone’s behavior,” said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

Kashkari said Treasury has used the TARP’s capital purchase program to invest an average of $16 million in 489 banks. He said the program was making about 30 new investments a week. At the same time, several banks have indicated a desire to pay back the federal funds early, citing the number of government restrictions that the Obama administration has attached to the capital injections and the
fear that other limits may be added.

Cowell Urges Accountability In Bailout Funds

Tags: , , ,


RALEIGH, N.C. – State Treasurer Janet Cowell urged today North Carolina’s Congressional Delegation to adopt stronger accountability measures governing federal bailout funds.

Cowell called for the adoption of recommendations of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Congressional Oversight Panel’s Special Report on Regulatory Reform issued last month.

The recommendations include: identifying and regulating financial institutions that pose systemic risk; limiting excessive leverage in American financial institutions; modernizing regulatory supervision of the “shadow financial system”; creating an executive pay structure that discourages excessive risk-taking; reforming the current credit rating system; and beginning contingency planning for future financial crises.

“It is vital to both our state and national economies to address the root causes of the financial crisis by fixing the current regulatory system,” Treasurer Cowell said. “We must restore a proper balance between free markets and a responsible, regulatory framework. Adopting the recommendations contained in the Congressional report is a critical step in doing so.”

Burr Statement on Economic Stimulus Legislation

Tags: , , , , ,


WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Richard Burr (R-North Carolina) issued the following statement on the Senate passage of H.R. 1, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009:

“The current economic crisis we are facing requires action, but the stimulus bill that was voted on in the Senate today was the wrong action.  It will spend nearly a trillion dollars on projects to expand government programs, and will provide little stimulus to the overall economy.  In fact, this bill will cost American taxpayers $209,550 for every job the bill’s supporters claim it will create.  These are some of the many reasons I opposed this bill.

“The serious economic crisis we are facing will balloon into an even larger crisis if our leaders do not put the government credit card away.  We are expected to have a $1.2 trillion deficit this year, and the National Debt is approaching $11 trillion. With the news of additional spending in the coming weeks from the administration, we could be spending close to $3 trillion dollars in the first 60 days of the year.”

North Carolinians Support Stimulus, Oppose Bailouts

Tags: , , , , , ,


RALEIGH, N.C. – A majority of North Carolina voters support the stimulus package Barack Obama has been pushing in Congress- but when it comes to the bailouts for the financial and auto industries, they’re strongly opposed, the newest survey from Public Policy Polling finds.

According to PPP, 50 percent of respondents said they support the stimulus, with 39 percent opposed and 11 percent unsure.

The divide falls largely along party lines, with 80 percent of Democrats but only 16 percent of Republicans in support. Independents oppose it by a 53-33 margin.

Reaction to the stimulus seems to be more of a referendum on whether people like Barack Obama than anything else.

Voter blocs that he did well with in November – women, African Americans, young voters- are all in strong support. Ones that he did not do as well with- whites, men- are more opposed.

“The economic stimulus package is very complicated, and it seems a safe bet that most voters don’t really understand it,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “What that means for public opinion is folks are forming their positions by taking cues from people they trust, leading Democrats who respect Barack Obama to be largely supportive, and Republicans to follow their Senate leadership in opposition.”

Two issues that there is not a lot of division among North Carolinians about are the bailouts of the financial and auto industries. Only 28 percent support the financial bailout and just 27 percent are in favor of the one for the car industry. In those cases Democrats, Republicans, and independents are all opposed although Democrats are somewhat more supportive than the other two groups.

PPP surveyed 1,105 North Carolina voters from Feb. 6 to 8. The survey’s margin of error is +/-3.0%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.

Complete results can be found at www.publicpolicypolling.com.

Bush Overpaid Banks In Bailout, Watchdog Says

Tags: , , , , ,


WASHINGTON- The Bush administration overpaid tens of billions of dollars for stocks and other assets in its massive bailout last year of Wall Street banks and financial institutions, a new study by a government watchdog says.

The Congressional Oversight Panel, in a report released Friday, said last year’s overpayments amounted to a taxpayer-financed $78 billion subsidy of the firms.

The findings added to the frustrations of lawmakers already wary of the $700 billion rescue plan, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Congress approved the plan last fall, but members of both parties criticized spending decisions by the Bush administration and former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.

Financially ailing insurance giant American International Group, which the Treasury Department deemed to be too big to be allowed to fail, received $40 billion from the Treasury for assets valued at $14.8 billion, the oversight panel found.

In December, in response to questions from the oversight panel, Paulson wrote that the value of preferred stock purchased by the government was “at or near par,” meaning Treasury paid $1 for every $1 dollar of asset.

“The way the Treasury secretary described it does not fit with the numbers that were produced in our much more extensive valuation analysis,” panel chairwoman Elizabeth Warren told reporters Friday. “The secretary of the Treasury described it in December that these were par transaction and that is not supported by the numbers.”
 
The continued scrutiny comes as new Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner prepares to place the Obama administration’s imprint on the program with a sweeping new framework for helping banks, loosening credit and helping reduce foreclosures. Geithner plans to unveil the changes Monday.

And while Paulson is gone and Geithner is in charge, the program itself remains in the hands of Neel Kashkari, a holdover from the Bush administration.

In December, Kashkari defended the Treasury purchasing strategy as bank stock prices dropped.

“We’re not day traders, and we’re not looking for a return tomorrow,” he said. “Over time, we believe the taxpayers will be protected and have a return on their investment.”

In a bright spot for the rescue program, the same banks that received capital infusions from Treasury have already paid $271 million in dividends to the federal government and are expected to pay $1.5 billion more in dividends by the end of this month. Wells Fargo, which received a $25 billion infusion, has already announced it would pay Treasury $371 million in dividends this month.

The oversight panel examined 10 transactions, including eight made under a capital purchase program designed to put liquidity into the banks in hopes of easing credit. That money went to banks considered “healthy” financially but in need of capital to make loans.

Two other transactions went to AIG and to Citigroup Inc. under programs designed to help companies that were facing serious financial difficulties.

Overall, the panel and the analysts it retained to conduct the valuation study found that the Treasury used taxpayers’ money to pay $62.5 billion more than the value of assets in the 10 transactions it examined. By extrapolating to the more than 300 institutions that received money, the panel concluded that the government in effect paid $78 billion more than the actual value of the assets at the time.

“Treasury chose to offer ‘one size fits all’ pricing in order to encourage all institutions to participate, and in so doing disregarded apparent differences in their financial condition,” the report states. “A consequence is that Treasury effectively offered weaker participants greater subsidies than it offered to stronger participants.”

Reacting to the panel’s conclusions, Treasury spokesman Isaac Baker said in a statement: “Treasury’s efforts since the fall prevented a systemwide collapse, but more needs to be done to stabilize the financial sector, increase lending and protect taxpayer dollars.”

He said the plan Geithner will announce Monday aims to free up credit, “while strengthening transparency and accountability measures so that taxpayers know where and how their money is being spent and whether it’s achieving real results.”

Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., said the overpayment was sure to “raise eyebrows.”

“I can understand some gap,” he said. “No one is expecting perfection between the price you pay and what you think you’re getting. But that’s a pretty large disparity.”

Obama Setting Pay Limits For Execs

Tags: , , , ,


President Obama announced Wednesday that executives of companies receiving federal bailout money will have their pay capped at $500,000 under a revised financial compensation plan, CNN reports.

NC Banks Accept Billions In Federal Aid

Tags: , , , , ,


Banks based in North Carolina have accepted more money from the Treasury Department’s rescue package than financial institutions in any state except New York, the nation’s financial capital.

With President Barack Obama promising to reshape the $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program before distributing the second half of the funding, details are emerging about how North Carolina banks are using the money received in the first round of payouts.

Since the program’s creation last fall, 20 North Carolina-based banks have accepted a total of $48.6 billion through TARP. The vast majority — $45 billion — went to Bank of America in Charlotte, the nation’s largest bank. The remaining funds went to institutions across North Carolina.

The TARP program was designed to loosen frozen credit markets that made it difficult for consumers and businesses to obtain loans.

Some North Carolina banking executives said in interviews this week they used the funds to increase lending. Others also funded acquisitions of other banks or used the extra cash to shore up capital reserves, uses that were not specifically prohibited by Treasury and in some cases were encouraged by Bush administration officials.

Republican and Democratic members of Congress and Obama have criticized the way the Bush administration handled the program. Obama has promised major changes when the $350 billion left under the program is distributed.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services committee, and other critics have complained about the low level of disclosure required of banks on how they use the money.

And he and others have accused Bush administration Treasury officials and some banks that received TARP funds of “distorting” the intent of the legislation by using the government money to buy other banks, pay out lavish bonuses and buy private jets — any use other than making loans.

Several North Carolina CEOs said that despite the push by the government to increase lending, the poor economy makes it difficult to find people and businesses who want to risk their current financial status for loans. The smaller pool of potential borrowers also was less likely to meet more rigorous lending standards that have came about over the last year.

“Not as many people are borrowing right now. They’re drawing back in and waiting for a turn in optimism before going forward with their plans,” said Scott Bauer, the chairman and chief executive of Southern Community Financial Corp. in Winston-Salem.

The bank received $42.8 million in December. Bauer said he plans to leverage it — borrow against it to bring in more capital — to make more loans. He said the bank has not ruled out using the money to “assume the assets of banks that might not make it.”

“We feel we have a fiduciary responsibility to use these funds prudently,” Bauer said.

Yadkin Valley Financial Corp. CEO Bill Long said that the bank is putting half the $36 million it received in January toward its $92 million cash and stock purchase of American Community Bancshares Inc. of Charlotte, a deal announced in September.

Long said the move made financial sense because it meant the Elkin bank would not have to borrow as much to finance the deal.

As for the rest, “Our goal with the money is to use it for growth in the communities we serve, such as loan growth,” he said. “It’s hard to determine where each dollar of that capital purchase is going since we just received the money on Jan. 23.”

Ted Ashby, CEO of Surrey Bank & Trust in Mount Airy, said his bank’s loan volume has increased over the last three months. He attributed the spike in part to new customers since the demise of some specialty lenders — those that focused on the trucking industry, for example. The bank received $2 million in January.

Ashby said tight credit markets have made it difficult to sell some loans to larger lenders. That forced the bank to keep more loans on its books, which requires larger capital reserves.

Like other North Carolina TARP beneficiaries, his bank was well capitalized before the government money arrived, Ashby said.

“In tough times like this, I’m not sure you can have too much capital,” Ashby said.

Other community banks said they had seen a spike in lending demand as interest rates have fallen, especially mortgage refinancing.

Roger Dick, president and CEO of Uwharrie Capital Corp. in Albemarle, said he expects to close over 125 single-family home loans in January, almost triple the volume in an average month. The company, which operates community banks in several counties, received $10 million in December. Dick said the bank could leverage it to make 10 times that amount in loans.

“The Catch 22 is that there’s not always good loan demand out there. People say, `loan this money right away.’ My response is to say, ‘be patient and let us do it in a prudent way.’ If not, it could cause more problems,” Dick said.

But, he said, “We’re doing what I think we’re supposed to be doing with the money, loaning it back to our community.”

Several large banks have been criticized for paying hefty bonuses to executives while staying silent about their lending activities.

When asking Congress to release the rest of the TARP funds, the Obama economic team indicated it would force greater disclosure about lending activities, limit purchases of other banks by recipients and impose stricter limits on executive compensation. The coming changes prompted some executives who received funding under the old rules to step up lending disclosure.

Bank of America said Wednesday that it would begin publishing tracking reports on its lending activities.

The Breakdown

State …………………..Sum received from Troubled Assets Relief Program

NY …………………$145.16 Billion

NC …………………… 48.55 Billion

CA …………………..27.37 Billion

MI …………………..21.18 Billion

PA ……………………. 8.77 Billion

OH ……………………..7.72 Billion

MN ……………………….7.00 Billion

GA ……………………..6.14 Billion

VA ……………………..4.04 Billion

AL ……………………..3.63 Billion

Source: Media General analysis of U.S. Treasury Department data

House Votes To Block TARP Funds – How NC Voted

Tags: , , , , ,


By SEAN MUSSENDEN
Media General News Service

WASHINGTON-The House voted Thursday to block President Barack Obama from accessing the second wave of funds from the $700 billion bailout of financial institutions.

Because the Senate killed an identical measure last week, the passage of the bill sponsored by Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., is unlikely to stop Obama from distributing to ailing banks and foreclosed homeowners the $350 billion remaining in the Troubled Assets Relief Program.

Congress created TARP at the behest of the Bush administration last fall to help thaw frozen credit markets.
The Bush administration’s oversight of the first wave of funds prompted protests by both Republican and Democratic lawmakers after banks held onto the cash instead of lending it and the program was expanded to include auto companies.

Foxx, like many Republicans and some Democrats, opposed the program from the start. She and other early TARP opponents argued that it would reward financial firms that made bad decisions while expanding the deficit, projected to hit $1.2 trillion this year.

“Any money that Congress spends is taken from hardworking Americans paying taxes or is borrowed from foreigners,” Foxx said Thursday while leading debate on the House floor.

The measure was approved 270-155, with all five North Carolina Republicans in the House voting to block the release of the money. North Carolina Democrats were split.

In the Senate vote last week, Sen. Kay Hagan, D-N.C., voted to release the funds, while Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., voted to block them.

At this point, only approval of Foxx’s bill by both chambers could block the release of the funds. There is little chance the Senate will bring Foxx’s version up for a vote, because the Democratic majority wants to let Obama access the money.

“This bill is dead…This is an exercise,” Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., head of the House Financial Services committee, said before the vote Thursday.

The Obama administration has promised several changes to TARP, including improved disclosure of banks receiving funds and a plan to direct between $50 billion and $100 billion to homeowners facing foreclosure.

“I know there are serious concerns about transparency and accountability… confusion about the goals of the program, and a deep skepticism about whether we are using the taxpayers’ money wisely,” Obama Treasury Secretary nominee Timothy Geithner said at a Senate hearing Wednesday.

The House passed a bill sponsored by Frank on Wednesday that would have written many of those promised changes into law, but Democratic leaders in the Senate have declined to take it up.

Though Frank said the vote on Foxx’s legislation would not stop Obama from using the funds, he said the new president should read it as indication of the public’s dissatisfaction with TARP as written and make the promised changes.

“There is a degree of anger in the American public at what they think is a very unfair system that gives benefits unduly and disproportionately to some who caused the problem,” he said.

Foxx said in an interview that she was troubled by the “lack of accountability” with TARP and hoped the strong vote in the House would convince the Senate to reconsider its decision and bring her bill up for a vote.

“I cannot find where Congress has given the administration a blank check like this. We’re saying, ‘Here’s $350 billion, go to it’,” she said.

How North Carolina House Members Voted

Yes (to block release of TARP funds)
Howard Coble, R
Virginia Foxx, R
Walter Jones, R
Larry Kissell, D
Patrick McHenry, R
Mike McIntyre, D
Sue Myrick, R
Heath Shuler, D

No (to release TARP funds)
G.K. Butterfield, D
Bob Etheridge, D
Brad Miller, D
David Price, D
Mel Watt, D

Highlights of President Barack Obama’s Proposed Changes to TARP
–Direct $50 billion to $100 billion to homeowners facing foreclosure.
–Improve public disclosure of institutions receiving funds.
–Require healthy banks that receive funds to increase lending to businesses and consumers.
–Limit some dividend payments by publicly held companies receiving assistance.
–Prevent firms receiving assistance from using funds to buy other firms.

Video Content

Candidate Statements

Decision 2008 in your inbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner