Winston-Salem Journal
Gov. Bev. Perdue made a good step toward helping the victims of North Carolina’s forced sterilization program when she included in her proposed budget $250,000 to start the process of providing financial compensation for them. Legislators should approve the allocation. And they should all also approve health-care benefits for the victims, as well as setting up a monument to them and including lessons about the sterilization program in the state’s public-school curriculum.
From 1929 through 1974, this state’s low-profile program, based on the junk science of eugenics, sterilized more than 7,600 men, women and children. Most were poor. They were operated on after being determined to be unfit to reproduce, a determination that was often based on questionable information supplied by overzealous social workers.
The program went largely unnoticed until late 2002, when a Journal investigative series brought it to light. Former Gov. Mike Easley led an initial charge to help the surviving victims. But his push soon fizzled, and little has been done to help the victims. Rep. Larry Womble of Forsyth County has kept pushing. As she ran for governor, Perdue promised to help as well. She deserves credit for following through on that promise in the midst of a state budget crisis.
The recession has probably been especially hard on the surviving victims of this program, which may number as many as 3,000. Many have been left with emotional and physical scars.
The $250,000 that Perdue included in her proposed budget would create a nonprofit foundation that could serve as a first step toward compensation for the victims. “It would be up to the foundation to work on the framework of identifying (victims) and compensation – and the money allocated in the budget would be able to do that – to support the parameters of the foundation and setup of a compensation fund,” Chrissy Pearson, the spokeswoman for Perdue, said in an e-mail last week. “It’s the first step to get to compensation.”
If the legislature approves the allocation, it will be one of many steps in a long process. In the meantime, Womble has filed a bill that would give the victims $20,000 each. The compensation would be justified. But it stands little chance of being approved in this tight economic year.
Another bill Womble has filed, one based on a legislative committee’s recommendations, is more realistic. It would give the victims mental-health care benefits, include the story of the program in the public-school curriculum and require that a historical marker about the program be created.
The victims should also receive help with the lingering physical effects of some of these operations. Perhaps that care could be provided at the state’s university hospitals. Such health-care benefits were part of recommendations that Easley approved almost six years ago.
So was a monument to the victims, not a historical marker. The monument should finally be approved as well.
The victims are growing older by the day. Many are dying. The state is running out of time to redeem itself and reach out to the victims of its colossal injustice.