Winston-Salem Journal Editorial
When an agency handles almost a billion dollars of public money, it must do so in the open and with both scrupulous adherence to the state ethics law and the fundamentals of good record-keeping.
None of that should come as news to Dan Gerlach, president of the Golden Leaf Foundation. So it is time for Gerlach, and the legislature, to make sure all of that happens.
State Auditor Beth Wood recently found disturbing violations of standard record-keeping at the foundation. Minutes for 29 of the foundation’s board meetings were not immediately available to auditors, and Wood reported that the foundation staff wasn’t fully cooperative.
In addition, auditors determined that the foundation approved a grant in 2005 while in closed session – a violation of the state’s Open Meetings Law.
The Golden LEAF Foundation operates under a special state law and is not a typical state agency. It runs on funds collected through the national tobacco settlement and its job has been, since its creation in 1999, to help hard-hit tobacco-dependent communities recover from their transition away from a leaf-based economy. It does so by issuing grants for a wide range of endeavors.
Special legislation or not, the foundation must not operate outside of the basic expectations of public agencies. The Open Meetings Law must be obeyed and staff members should immediately surrender minutes to anyone who requests them. Gerlach should make “cooperation” a foundation byword.
The worst of the transgressions appear to have occurred during the tenure of the previous president, and some corrections have been made. The grant issued during a 2005 closed meeting was rescinded 60 days later, for example. Gerlach, who has been in the job a year, promises to do better. He was a budget official for former Gov. Mike Easley and did outstanding work before that as an advocate for a nonprofit agency.
But one man’s assurances are not enough. Systemic issues here must be addressed. The foundation spends money independently of the legislature, and that practice must be reviewed and more oversight instituted. And foundation board members are not subject to the state’s ethics law, just to an internal ethics code.
There may be aspects of the ethics law that would not fit with the foundation board’s special status, but the legislature can make adjustments if necessary. Foundation officials should be covered by the law.
Having already spent $393 million of state money and with another $550 million on hand, the foundation is important to the economic development of tobacco-dependent areas. Its work should be held to the highest public standards.
