Wind | Politics.MyNC.com

Tag Archive | "wind"

NC Bill Would Keep Wind Turbines Off Mountaintops

Tags: ,


RALEIGH, N.C.  – North Carolina senators have approved banning wind turbines from Appalachian ridges, balancing potential for green energy against unspoiled mountain vistas.

The Senate voted 42-1 on Thursday to establish regulations for where wind turbines can be built. It next heads to the state House, where it may not come up until next spring.

The proposed law would require a state permit to build wind farms. They could be blocked if they harm navigation, wildlife, or the views from any state or national park. Single windmills of up to 100 feet tall could power a home.

Senators rejected pleas by green-power advocates not to ban an industry some mountain communities are trying to encourage and Appalachian State University is a leader in studying.

NC Bill Would Regulate Where Wind Turbines Can Go

Tags: ,


RALEIGH, N.C.  – North Carolina senators are looking more closely at how to balance the growing demand for green energy with environmental protection, development and tourism.

A Senate committee meeting on Tuesday considers statewide regulations for where wind turbines can be built. The proposed law would allow a permit needed to build wind turbines if they would have a negative effect on navigation, wildlife, or the views from any state or national park.

The potential for wind power is greatest at the North Carolina coast and in the mountains. That’s also where tourism interests fear turning off visitors by adding spinning high-tech windmill blades to scenes of natural beauty.

A 2007 state law requires utilities to diversify by adding wind, solar and other green energy sources.

Obama to Talk Up Wind Power on Earth Day in Iowa

Tags: , , ,


WASHINGTON  – President Barack Obama’s return to Iowa gives him a chance to mark Earth Day with a pitch for his alternative energy plan and environmentally friendly jobs.

The visit to the state that launched him on the road to the White House comes as Obama’s energy legislation has slowed in Congress, with skeptical Republicans and some Democrats from coal-producing states fearing the plan will increase costs for consumers, send jobs overseas and hurt businesses.

In financially struggling Newton, Iowa, Obama planned to tour – then highlight – Trinity Structural Towers wind energy plant as a model for job creation and energy production in a town whose biggest employer was sold and then stopped operations.

Newton’s Maytag Corp. appliances plant closed in 2007, costing the small city hundreds of jobs. But a year later, the state announced that Trinity Structural Towers would build a $21 million factory on the former Maytag site and employ about 140 workers, in exchange for business incentives and tax breaks.

The administration contends that the president’s plan will create jobs and protect the environment.

In an Earth Day proclamation, Obama said protecting the nation’s natural resources “not only fulfills a sacred obligation to our children and grandchildren, but also provides an opportunity to stimulate economic growth.”

Obama’s post-inauguration itinerary reads like a list of battleground and Republican-leaning states that helped lift him to the presidency and will be critical in any re-election bid. He’s traveled to Colorado, North Carolina, Indiana, Ohio and Florida. The visit to Iowa Wednesday was his first since the election.

Obama staged a surprise upset over one-time rival Hillary Rodham Clinton to win Iowa’s caucuses in January 2008, giving him much-needed momentum out of the caucuses that sparked a marathon nomination struggle. His Iowa field operation for 2012 is up and running, with town-hall meetings scheduled this week.

Obama’s energy plan would drive more investments to companies such as Trinity, which builds the towers that support wind turbines. White House officials said that beyond the boost to the economy that such investment would bring, families also would benefit eventually from lower energy costs.

To that end, the administration’s economic stimulus plan included some $5 billion for low-income weatherization programs and $2 billion for electric car research. Another $500 million was set aside to train workers for “green jobs,” such as those at Trinity Structural Towers.

White House environmental advisers also say the costs of dealing with climate change can be reduced dramatically by adopting programs that will spur energy efficiency and wider use of non-fossil energy such as wind, solar and biofuels.

Yet wind-produced electricity still totals just under 2 percent of all electricity generated, according to the American Wind Energy Association, a trade group.

During his political campaign, Obama touted wind as a prime source of renewable energy. Aides say he’s remains steadfast in his support for an energy plan that would reduce greenhouse gases by 20 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, and 83 percent by mid-century.

Obama’s plan also calls for a series of measures aimed at reducing the use of fossil energy, such as requiring utilities to produce a quarter of their electricity from renewable sources.

The House began four days of hearings on climate legislation Tuesday, but the challenge of getting bipartisan support immediately became apparent. Energy Secretary Steven Chu, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood reinforced Obama’s message in testimony Wednesday.

The administration officials expressed broad support for a House Democratic bill but indicated the White House would work with Congress on the specifics of the legislation.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chief sponsor of a bill that would limit greenhouse gases, echoed the president’s argument, saying his proposal to tackle climate change would spur clean energy development and won’t be a drag on the economy.

Symbolically, though, the administration’s efforts to highlight clean energy was a victim of the weather. A White House event with energy-efficient vehicles Wednesday morning had to be postponed due to rain.

McCain And Obama’s Energy Proposals

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


A look at some of the positions of the presidential candidates on energy and global warming:

Republican John McCain:
      -Favors building 45 nuclear power reactors by 2030. Proposes no federal spending to help build the plants, but use of government loan guarantees in existing law. Calls for opening Yucca Mountain for reactor waste and for reviving nuclear waste reprocessing, which was ended because of nuclear proliferation concerns. Argues nuclear power, which emits no greenhouse gases, will help deal with climate change.
      -Favors increased offshore drilling and increased production as primary means to break dependence on foreign oil; opposes drilling in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
      -Mandatory reductions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by 66 percent from 1990 levels by 2050, using a market-based cap-and-trade system that would increase energy costs.
      -Supports $2 billion program to develop carbon capture and other clean coal research and development.
      -$5,000 tax credit for the purchase of zero carbon emission cars; $300 million prize for improved batteries for hybrid vehicles.
     

Democrat Barack Obama:
      -Ten-year, $150 billion fund for biofuels, wind, solar, plug-in hybrids, clean-coal technology and other “climate-friendly” measures as prime means to break dependence on foreign oil. Money to come from auctioning pollution permits under a program to address climate change.
      -Mandatory reductions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by 80 percent from 1990 levels by 2050, using a market-based, cap-and-trade system that would increase energy costs.
      -Increase federal fuel economy requirements from 35 mpg to 40 mpg.
      -Now would consider limited expansion of offshore oil and gas drilling. Opposes drilling in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
      -Proposes windfall-profits tax on largest oil companies to pay for energy rebate of up to $1,000.
      -Expand federal requirements for ethanol from 36 million gallons to 60 million gallons a year with increase coming from non-corn sources, and require utilities to produce 25 percent of power from renewable energy such as wind, solar and biomass by 2025.
      -$7,000 tax credit for the purchase of advance-technology vehicles; put 1 million plug-in hybrid cars on road by 2015.

Video Content

Candidate Statements

Decision 2008 in your inbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner